Skip to content

I Have Forgiven Aslan for Being Jesus, But I Still Hate Fairytales

31
Share

I Have Forgiven Aslan for Being Jesus, But I Still Hate Fairytales

Home / I Have Forgiven Aslan for Being Jesus, But I Still Hate Fairytales
Books Fairy Tales

I Have Forgiven Aslan for Being Jesus, But I Still Hate Fairytales

By

Published on August 17, 2016

31
Share

Coming home after a night out, mind on anything else, I somehow stumbled into a very specific memory, for probably the first time in years: The day I took my third-grade teacher Mrs. Bell aside, the next year, and shared with her my concerns that Aslan might possibly be Jesus.

I’d trusted Mrs. Bell implicitly with stories ever since the time she burst into tears at the end of Sadako and the Thousand Paper Cranes—she got it. She was a subject of Terebithia, if you know what I mean. So when she said, essentially: “Yeah, it’s called an allegory. Please don’t ruin it for everybody,” I was disappointed. To me at this age, it was the Santa Claus conspiracy all over again, more of the same. I trusted her, and she’d turned out to be just another Episcopalian robot, I mumbled to myself. “Here it is again: The Machine.”

That year they made much of CS Lewis’s inscription to his goddaughter, something like, “To Lucy, who will eventually get old enough to respect fairytales again,” which, in addition to being the exact kind of twee nonsense that hacked me off anyway as a child, was also prime evidence that the whole thing—meaning my life; books were my life—was another massive trick on behalf of the Big Jesus industry.

I remember too, expressing vivid concerns, probably around this same time, that the creators of Elfquest were probably Christians, too: Everything that I loved, vide L’Engle, eventually turned out religious—and therefore suspect; therefore cruel—in the end. It didn’t occur to me then that I was putting that particular cart before the horse, or that in fact the only thing I really liked was crypto-Christian stories, by Christian authors, who knew me well enough to know I didn’t want to hear about it.

But previous to all of this, thanks to pagan parenting, Jesus was just a character, literally just another historical figure, like my heroes Harriet Tubman and Margaret Mead from the Value Tales books I adored.

In fact, thanks to an offhand comment from a museum docent, I spent several years under the impression that Jesus was a wartime contemporary of Hannibal, whom I loved because he rode elephants into battle, and Napoleon, who at some point during all of this—either out of boredom or sheer bloody-minded treachery—shot the nose clean off the Sphinx, with a musket.

So it wasn’t until a long time later, after fighting Narnia a hundred times and reading each and every one of the Lev Grossman books on the day they came out, no matter how much I disliked them, that I realized she was right.

She was right, and we all seem to have forgotten it—if you take out the purpose of a fairytale, in your well-meaning attempt to update or reboot it, you are going to create exactly what you’re agitating for: a cartoon universe where everything is equally meaningful, in which Luke Skywalker does battle with a karate-kicking Prophet Muhammad, Jesus flies around fighting with Iron Man, and what they stand for—or mean, to the deeper part of you—stops being real.

When you are very excited about being An Atheist—which is different from simply not believing there’s a real live God, which I do not—you could see everything that way: Math. Once a lion has hurt you, you’re only interested in fighting the tame ones.

For me, it became very important early on that I draw and maintain distinct lines between what is “real,” mythologically, and what are merely stories about mythology. Identifying and separating out the real is a completely personal, completely subjective process. Hobbits: Not Real—but Númenor is Real, and Atreyu is Real. Harriet the Spy and Morpheus the Sandman are Real; Aurora is not Real, but Sleeping Beauty is very Real. (Until her recent film, which at least got close enough to touch some of the old magic, Maleficent wasn’t Real, but now she might be.)

Ariel is Real, although the sequels are not. (Prince Eric: Not only Real but crucial, if you get me.) Captain America and Superman are Real; Dr. Strange is not particularly Real. Hermes, Ares and Dionysus were always Real, but Zeus and Apollo and Hera weren’t Real for a long time. Hal Jordan is Real but Kyle Rayner is only kind of Real; Jean Grey was always Real, but Cyclops and Emma Frost fought very hard to become Real. Labyrinth is more Real than I’m comfortable with, to this day; double that for The Last UnicornFrozen pretends not to be Real, but it’s the Realest damned thing I’ve ever seen.

I’m sure the particulars would be different for everybody, is my point: Your totems are yours. But when I talk about hating fairytales, which I have heard can be confusing, that’s what I mean: You can manipulate them, make them more or less true—and odds are that this has taken place, which is why they aren’t to be trusted; why it’s easier to say I hate them than to explain which ones I hate and why, on a personal scale that applies only to me and is constantly shifting—but ultimately, it’s the gut that determines it.

Or more properly: When they are about “Us,” and not about us: The very real Us that includes everybody, even “Them.”

Or I guess, when they’re about your relationship to those things, to magic and strong feelings, whatever forms divinity takes, is. Because I can’t think of anybody I know that loves Aslan—or Jesus, or television, or America—the particular way that I do, which is to say: Exactly as much as they distrust them. It always seems to be one or the other, which is the war we fight now, and I can’t help but think that’s the dumbest possible option.

Because whatever the story is—whatever the allegory, whether it’s religion or fairytale or something newer—you only hit magic when you find yourself in that hazy, technically infinite space between your best and your daily self. Not just the lifehacks offered by trite morals, or cautionary tales—Hans Christian Anderson and Oscar Wilde get away with being Real; Ursula K. Le Guin and Jane Yolen couldn’t stop if they tried; even postmodernists like Sheri Tepper and Neil Gaiman can nail it, when they let themselves—but the actual connective space, the width of a spark, between yourself right-at-this-moment, and yourself at a peak moment of discovery, joy, or compassion.

All that’s really required of us—from the stories, religious or otherwise, that already know how we spend most of our lives, between the two; from those stories that are Real—is to remember that place exists, which is to say: How to find meaning in a world you know doesn’t have a lot of meaning to offer, but a ton of everything else. All of it which proves, eventually, Real. Even the stuff you don’t want, or believe ever could, be. All the things and people, the parts of yourself, that you’ve said No to.

We shed the concrete—animals marching, two by two—and the ignorant—poor Susan Pevensie, cast off for wearing lipstick, a daughter of her era—and the monstrous—fundamentalism, misogyny, hatred—and are left with something very true, and pure, and bright. Sometimes it doesn’t take much, sometimes that magic’s all there is, and you don’t have to work at all. But one way or another you get through the forest, through all those grasping trees, and out into the meadows, and you get a chance to take a breath and get clean and start all over again.

Further up, and further in.

Geek Love is a column on the art of politics, the affliction of writing, and the care and feeding of your geeks. An earlier version of this essay appeared on jacobclifton.com.
Top image: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe (2005)

Jacob Clifton is a former Television Without Pity writer and Gawker editor. His favorite religious characters are Serafina Pekkala and Marilla “To despair is to turn your back on God” Cuthbert, Eustace Clarence Scrubb is his favorite Narnia character, and his favorite television show is, either against all odds or inevitably, The Magicians.

About the Author

Jacob Clifton

Author

Jacob Clifton is a freelance writer and critic based in Austin, Texas. He currently recaps shows for Bravo's Television Without Pity, and can be found online at jacobclifton.com, on Twitter, and on Facebook.

Learn More About Jacob
31 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
karwolf
8 years ago

Just this morning I read The Velveteen Rabbit  to my two-year old.  Your discussion of real and not real very much struck me as exactly what I just read in that fairy tale.  “Everything that is real was imagined once.”  

Avatar
scottly
8 years ago

Some day I’d love to see that Elfquest anti-apologetic. For whatever reason the notion of taking The Spirituality Of Wendy Pini with complete Mythlore seriousness . . . like it too deserves to join the real . . . practically breaks my heart right now. 

Avatar
alea_iacta_est
8 years ago

I honestly don’t understand this article. Could someone explain it to me, please?

Avatar
ad
8 years ago

poor Susan Pevensie, cast off for wearing lipstick, a daughter of her era

 

She is not cast off for wearing lipstick. She casts herself off by refusing to try and get back into and help Narnia (whilst claiming that this place she has been to is entirely imaginary as an excuse) because trying to get back into Narnia would play havoc with her social life.

Avatar
V
8 years ago

What a coincidence, I just watched Tale of Tales last night. I’d liken that experience to slamming face first into a brick wall of REAL.

Avatar
8 years ago

@3

“I honestly don’t understand this article. Could someone explain it to me, please?”

 

I’m with you.  Other than a vaguely anti-religious allegory slant, I’m not sure I see the point.  Perhaps a reading of Tolkien’s seminal “On Fairy Stories” could clear things up?  I’m not sure. 

Avatar
Mark Magee
8 years ago

@3 @6

I agree, I found this article extremely difficult to follow. Also can someone help me understand why Aslan being Jesus is such a big deal for people? 

Avatar
8 years ago

I thought it was just me. I was like what the freak is this dude trying to say too, but for some reason I was intrigued enough that I did keep reading. 

Avatar
DougL
8 years ago

Well, I am aware that there is a brand of Christianity that believes Jesus and God to be the same person or something, because I think in Magician’s Nephew, Aslan creates Narnia.

What happened with Susan never sat with me right, it’s like banning someone from heaven for the dumbest reason while taking everything from her at the same time. Nothing she did before matters, only what’s happening right now.

Jason_UmmaMacabre
8 years ago

@9, you are correct. There are numerous Scriptures that support God and Jesus being the same entity. The concept of the trinity was not formalize in Christian doctrine until almost 300 years after Christ’s ascension. 

Cassanne
8 years ago

See, it might be my atheist upbringing, but I never bought the Aslan = Jesus. Aslan is God, he is the immortal creator. He does not plan to wipe away anyone’s sins. He does not turn the other cheek, he claws bad children in the back to teach them to behave. Yes, he lets himself get sacrificed at one point – but it’s a fake out. He knows he is immortal and that he’ll not really die. It’s just meant as another cruel but important lesson for the children. Which is all fine behaviour for the majestic creator Lion he is, but doesn’t sound at all like what I know of Jesus and his philosophy.

Also, there are fauns and satyrs and other minor gods in that world. And the kids say ‘By Jove –  that might just be an english thing? But child me took it to mean this is not a christian story. Same with the thing where the children are descended from Adam and Eve, but the people in Narnia are not.

Though still atheist, I do love Aslan and would worship him if only he opened the door to Narnia for me. (Or would have, before I hit puberty…)

Blake Harrison
Blake Harrison
8 years ago

I’m not sure I completely understood what the author was trying to say here…at all. I think it had to do with disliking fantasy written by Christians and then getting over it? Finding the real in the unreal? Honestly, though well written, it was more than a little confusing. I’d love to know more about what the author’s intentions were with this article. I wondered, more than once, if I could be friends with him or if we would drive eachother crazy. It’s a thought experiment I like to try when I read article with contrary opinions to my own

@7, I’ve been told that Atheists dislike Aslan because it tries to sneak religion into a story and “trick” them into becoming Christian. I’m a Christian, so I can’t comment further on the subject.

@11, I enjoyed reading your comment and your perspective. Thank you for sharing it with us. I’ve wondered more than once how Aslan could hurt people and still be an analogue for Jesus. I’ve also wondered why Lewis chose to include various Greek myths in his story. 

Avatar
8 years ago

@3, I would say this article is more like poetry. It is about feelings and connections more than a linear essay. I’m not usually a fan of poetry, so I’m not saying that’s good, but in this case it did work for me. 

As for what it’s about, I would say it is about feeling betrayed, as a child, by expectations that were never promised and never met. Books have a special, individual meaning for children who love them, and if that meaning is later usurped by a different popular or authorial interpretation, it can hurt. 

The part about things being Real, or not Real, was not about what exists, but in what has a chord of truth to it, in the reader’s own mind. It’s the same thing people mean when they say a character was brought to life in a story. They don’t exist, but the honesty of their story grabs you in a way that leaves you changed. That makes them Real. 

So that’s my guess as to what it is about.

@7 As for Aslan being Jesus, it isn’t exactly a big deal. It is more that it can be annoying and oppressive to non-Christians. I’m an atheist, too, and when I figured out that Aslan was Jesus, it bothered me. It is fine for Christianity to be part of stories, but to me this one felt like it was snuck in there and Lewis was playing a trick on his readers to get them to agree with Christianity.

Edit: after I posted this, I saw another comment was posted just before mine. @12, I guess you took the words out of my mouth :)

Avatar
Anne
8 years ago

“…the actual connective space, the width of a spark, between yourself right-at-this-moment, and yourself at a peak moment of discovery, joy, or compassion.”

Love this.

(And agreed: nothing’s as capital-R real as “The Last Unicorn.” <3)

Avatar
Kate M.
8 years ago

I too, am more than a little confused at this. Does the article writer dislike certain themes or happily ever afters in particular? Is it simplification or complexity in a fantasy story that causes more discerning problems? Is it nuances and dimensions that make the character more bearable or less so? Is it particularly adding religious tones in a work that bothers him here? And does it make a difference if it’s based on myth or a contemporary religion? Let’s be frank, myths at a certain times were religions. Why make an article rant then leave it feeling ambiguous? It really stirs up a lot questions for me.

To myself, I tend to like complicated fairy tales with characters having backstories. It can be either religious or not if I like the story and characters enough. As long as it doesn’t over glorify it in your face I don’t see it as much a problem. In an over glorifying scenario, I think it could take away from the story’s pace or the character development. Some do pull it off working with deities like American Gods or The Iron Druid Chronicles. A tricky balancing act to do at times. But I do wonder if particular common themes just get this article writer’s goat?

Avatar
8 years ago

Not relevant: I was just thinking about the story Sadako and the Thousand Paper Cranes recently. Are they still reading that in grade school?

This isn’t meant to come off as a negative, but I giggled through some of your descriptions of Jesus and Iron Man. It kind of reminded me of the South Park episode about the Super Friends :)

Anyway, this article isn’t exactly what I expected; I’m not sure it’s necessarily anti religious allegory (although maybe it is?) but just seems more about the idea that different tales speak to different people and are ‘Real’ for whatever reason (which does somewhat vaguely remind me of Tolkien’s ideas about myth being ‘true’ even if not literally true). I’ll be honest; I prefer his writing (which is some of the Real-est writing there is to me – something about the truths baked in resonates very deeply for me) over Lewis’s straightforward allegory, but that has its place too.

@12 and others – Jesus wasn’t always super nice though; he had his moments of flipping tables and rebuking and all that. I admit it’s been a really long time since I’ve read any of the Narnia books so I can’t remember all the details, but so far nothing anybody has said has put me off of the Aslan=Jesus idea, since the idea that the Trinity contains 3 distinct persons that are still one doesn’t rule out the fact that Aslan is also the Creator.  I don’t really get the ‘fake out’ comment, as Jesus would also know he was immortal, but that’s not really the point. As for the Greek myths, from what I’ve read, Tolkien, Lewis and their contemporaries were pretty in to studying all that stuff and finding, well…the ‘Real’ in it :)  They were big believers of the beauty of certain parts of paganism.

@13 – I like your comment about the betrayal. I can definitely relate to that in other works where my version of what that story ‘means’ to me is later changed and…it hurts more than it should.

Avatar
8 years ago

It seems I wasn’t the only one who had no idea what this was supposed to be about.

Avatar
8 years ago

I still remember as a kid when I read that CS Lewis had intended Aslan as a Jesus reference and feeling obscurely tricked or betrayed. I think it was because I’d enjoyed the Narnia books so much, and the idea that they were some sort of stalking horse for ‘church’ (which I found intensely boring at that age) suddenly changed the way I felt about the books.

As I got older I started to accept that authors might have different ideas about stuff than I did, but I don’t think I ever re-read the Narnia books.

beautyinruins
8 years ago

I spotted the heavy-handed Christian allegory early on, but was willing to suspend my disbelief and see where the stories went. The last book was such an utter betrayal, however, I threw it in the trash and never looked back. Utter garbage. There are far better fantasies to wean my son on.

Avatar
AnneBonney
8 years ago

I missed Narnia as a kid — I’m not entirely sure why, it may be as simple as circling The Dark Is Rising series in the Scholastic Book Order form one month instead on a whim — but when I got a synopsis from a friend in middle school I immediately recognized and hated Aslan-is-Jesus.  On my university’s literary magazine editorial board, I would aggressively nay vote anything that even remotely smacked of Christian allegory. It became A Thing for me for a while, until I started to grow up and chill out and be less obnoxious to nice people who don’t share my passion for sleeping until 1 pm on Sundays.

But this article made me looking at that aversion again, and even more than being an edgy tween Atheist protesting my CCD classes or whatever, I think the reason I rejected stories like Narnia out of hand is because there was no way they could be Real because they were trying, desperately, to lead you somewhere specific. I wasn’t about stories that had “agenda”, religious or otherwise (don’t get me started about the goddamn Boxcar Children).  

And if what makes certain stories Real is they give you truths and tools about yourself and other people, wasn’t the Bible already Real enough, story we tell to make us better? Why make a house of mirrors by adding a lion on top of a magical carpenter on top of the central, Real idea of Christianity (the Golden Rule)?  Basically, why would a banana want to grab another banana?

Valan
8 years ago

OK, after reading some of the comments and re-reading this article it is a little less confusing and more intriguing. I think what made it click the most is the fact that Le Guin couldn’t stop being Real if she tried.

But… but… WHY do you hate fairytales?? 

(I’m almost finished with Valente’s Deathless and this idea is anathema to me at the moment)

Avatar
A. Freed
8 years ago

Whenever people start discussing the notion of whether the Narnia books qualify as allegory, or express their (sincere) hurt at feeling like C.S. Lewis “tricked” them, I always feel obliged to point out that Lewis didn’t think of the books as allegorical. Wikipedia, conveniently, has some of the relevant quotes:

 

If Aslan represented the immaterial Deity in the same way in which Giant Despair [a character in The Pilgrim’s Progress] represents despair, he would be an allegorical figure. In reality, however, he is an invention giving an imaginary answer to the question, ‘What might Christ become like if there really were a world like Narnia, and He chose to be incarnate and die and rise again in that world as He actually has done in ours?’ This is not allegory at all.

 

My reading: Aslan isn’t an allegory for Christ. Aslan is Christ (within the context of Lewis’s fictional world), the same way that, say, alternate reality Earth-2 Superman isn’t an allegory for Earth-1 Superman. Lewis was a Christian. He had a Christian worldview. When building a fantasy world, he built it in accordance with the world he believed in (as Tolkien did, surely).

None of this protects the novels from criticism–you can argue that Aslan is a clumsy or too-obvious or too-subtle interpretation of Christ, or that the religious elements drag down other elements of the storytelling–but I’m always saddened when people criticize Lewis’s intent in this regard, as if he were sneaking vitamins into the chocolate pudding. Constructing stories that express particular moral worldviews is what authors do. That’s the point.

(I’m more sympathetic to authorial criticism of Lewis regarding the Susan issue, and, oddly, less sympathetic of the textual criticism. Lewis had issues with women, clearly, and they informed his choices. Nonetheless, the notion that one of the children becomes so wrapped up in being adult that she denies something profoundly important to her is, I think, effectively resonant. The execution isn’t perfect, but I’m glad it’s in there.)

Avatar
8 years ago

I didn’t understand that Aslan was supposed to be Jesus until I was an adult.  Being Jewish, I choose to ignore that aspect; and I still love all of the Narnia books except for The Last Battle, which I refuse to reread.  

Avatar
8 years ago

I love that there are people who can’t understand this column.  It’s REAL! (and you’ve nailed what always made me uncomfortable about Dr. Strange).

As for whether Narnia is allegory, Tolkien thought it was, or at least “strayed too far into allegory”. I’m with Tolkien.

Avatar
8 years ago

Exactly. Whenever “The Problem of Susan” is brought up as something anti-feminist or anti-sex, it drives me crazy, because it’s nothing of the sort. The problem was she was being a wet blanket. And she lived and almost certainly matured, so she wasn’t “cast off”.

Avatar
Roxana
7 years ago

I get so SICK OF THIS! 

Susan is NOT ‘cast out’ of Narnia. She is not exiled, excommunicated or rejected.

SUSAN has rejected Narnia. She has chosen to live entirely in and for the ‘Real World’ and the pleasures of being young, beautiful and female. BTW this is NOT an either/or call she could easily go to parties, flirt and wear makeup AND be Queen Susan of Narnia or do we think Peter, Edmund and Lucy – And Polly and Diggory for that matter – have been living in monasteries all their lives in our world? Was not Susan beautiful and desired as Queen Susan? 

The point is Susan has cast Narnia out of her life but it’s still  there. Aslan’s still there. All she ever has to do is let them back in and we Lewis’ word that she very well might ‘in her own time and in her own way.’

BTW I am not a Christian and completely missed the Aslan=Jesus thing for over a decade. Embarrassing.

Avatar
Tengu
7 years ago

I recently re-read the Chronicles of Narnia and was baffled by how pagan it was.

No more Xtian than the Calormen are Islamic.

I wasnt bothered by the fate of Susan but I am an enemy of lipstick and girl stuff.

Avatar
draconicempress
7 years ago

oh man this writer gets me. Yes! There are Real stories and Unreal stories and, reading your list, the stories that are Real for me probably aren’t Real for you, and vice versa! There are so many books where I’m like “this is beautiful but it’s not Real,” and other books where I go “this is objectively bad but it’s so gosh dang Real that I can’t put it down.” And I absolutely feel you on the weird, creeping betrayal of Christian undertones in fiction where you didn’t expect them and don’t want them to be. 

Avatar
Paladin Burke
5 years ago

Great essay!  When I was studying for my BA in History 30+ years ago, I had a history professor who you to say:  “It’s far worse for myth to become fact than for fact to become myth.”  He was right.